FACHEP vs. The People of the State of Michigan: Part IX One Day of Unfiltered Love

The Big Picture

Flintwaterstudy launched July 2015 to “help resolve scientific uncertainties associated with drinking water issues being reported in the City of Flint, MI.” We worked overtime to expose the depths of the Flint Water Crisis in terms of lead, legionella and unethical government behavior—a Federal Emergency was declared January 2016.

The resulting international media sensation and $600+ million in relief funding accomplished great good but also created powerful corrupting influences. A peer-reviewed paper Citizen Science During the Flint, Michigan Federal Water Emergency: Ethical Dilemmas and Lessons Learned published last week describes some gut-wrenching issues encountered in 2016-2018, and our attempts to address them.

About a year ago we launched this investigative science blog series, to shed light on the felony cases against Dr. Eden Wells and Mr Nick Lyon. At the time wrote about a presumption of guilt and perjury concerns as follows:

 “In late September 2015, we wrote that some MDHHS employees were behaving unethically, but within a few days MDHHS reversed course by agreeing the water was unsafe, and after Dr. Wells started working with us in December 2015, we were impressed enough to call her out publicly in a good way on our webpage on January 7, 2016. Ever since, Michigan government has supported our scientific work and professionally answered all our questions, even when they were fully aware our research was showing that the switch to Flint River water was one key factor contributing to the Legionnaires’ Disease outbreak and associated deaths. We published two peer-reviewed journal papers documenting this science in 2016 and 2017At no point did anyone at MDHHS or the governor’s office discourage or impede our teams ground-breaking research that helped reveal the Flint Legionella outbreak.

Given our own positive experiences with MDHHS since December 2015, we were surprised when professors representing the Flint Area Community Health and Environment Partnership (FACHEP) alleged under oath that the State of Michigan had not cooperated with their Legionella research. Indeed, sworn testimony by FACHEP professors was a basis for felony “obstruction of justice” charges against Wells and Lyons. To date, the media has generally sided with the presumably noble FACHEP professors and against the maligned state employees in all such disputes.  Starting with this article, Flintwaterstudy will present an investigative series that calls that narrative into question…”

We are publicly blowing the whistle on our colleagues in this blog series because a miscarriage of justice might result if we were to remain silent. That injustice involves not just the lives of Dr. Wells and Mr. Lyon, but also the historical record of government achievement during the Flint Disaster response—it involves the commodity of public-trust, of which there is precious little in present day Flint. We blow the whistle not because it is easy or will be rewarded, but because it is hard and righteous. As Dr. Edwards correctly predicted to the Detroit News “…I fully expect to pay a professional price for upholding my responsibilities.”

When asked if he felt naïve about the later efforts to destroy his professional reputation, Edwards told the Washington Post: “It comes down to duty versus self-preservation….In a post-truth world, science has become just another weapon of tribal warfare, and rising above that takes courage.” We do fear for the fate of our world, if university professors go Post-truth.

Paraphrasing Winston Churchill, some might ask: “What is our aim?” To answer in one word, it is TRUTH.  Truth with a capital T. Truth, in spite of ourselves. Truth, with all its warts, human frailty, and soul-sickening unethical behavior. For without truth, as was tragically illustrated during the Flint Water Crisis and its aftermath… we will all sink into the abyss of a new dark age made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science.”


Part IX: One Day of Unfiltered Love

(December 14, 2016 – December 15, 2016) 

An investigative science reporting series by Flintwaterstudy.org

Part 8 ended with FACHEP falsely assuring project manager Dr. Eden Wells (MDHSS) that the forthcoming December 14th, 2016 public meeting at the Flint Library would present nothing new, even as they prepared a presentation that would scare Flint residents and portray the State of Michigan unfavorably.

Dr. Ben Pauli (Kettering) later admitted that the purpose of the meeting was “to roll out <FACHEP> preliminary results directly to residents,” “winning over” the activists “who saw the state <of MI> as their number-one enemy” by emphasizing possible dangers of Flint water. FACHEP also figured that the story about bacteria, offered “hopeofimpeding the rush to declare the crisis over.

Let’s imagine ourselves in Dr. Wells’ shoes at 5 am the morning after the Flint library meeting, as she learned about media coverage, social media fallout, and FACHEPs sidebar conversations with residents. Illustrative snippets of each are provided below.

MEDIA COVERAGE. Although McElmurry told Wells no media would be invited, they attended and had a field day. Mlive ran a story with Dr. Love’s proclamation that it was important to flush the filtersat least one minuteto clear away dangerous bacteria and that residents should also be “boiling water or using a UV disinfection lamp” to treat filtered water. Her claims contradicted 11-13 months of unified messaging (FEMA, United Way, National Guard, ATSDR, EPA, GCHD, MDEQ, MDHSS, CDC, City of Flint, and FlintWaterStudy) that it was ok to directly drink POU filtered Flint water.

Photo of Dr. Love at Flint library purchased from Mlive

Mlive also quoted Melissa Mays, who was collaborating with FACHEP on an effort to create a narrative Flint water was getting worse:

“It was nice to hear that things aren’t all better… I can only imagine what would happen if I were to try to drink this through the tap filters. It’s telling me I’m making the right decision by drinking bottled water.”

FACHEP leader McElmurry expressed a self-promotional worldview, that no one else working on the FWC could possibly care for Flint residents, like “Wayne Cares for Flint.” 

it’s important that Flint residents know “that there are people out there working to understand the concerns that residents have.”

WNEM Channel 5 trumpeted “WATER SAMPLES REVEAL PROBLEM FOR FLINT RESIDENTS,” quoting Dr. Zervos (WSU):  “There’s issues with the point of use filters….bacteria levels actually increase… for bacteria there’s an issue.” Mr. Quincy Murphy, an activist who was on FACHEP’s payroll, stated “…the preliminary test results confirm many residents’ fears…. We just keep getting the run around and these people telling us it’s OK…we don’t know who to trust and who to believe.”

SOCIAL MEDIA. A selection of some social media quotes poignantly illustrate that Dr. Love’s presentation had a significant impact, including planting the idea that Flint residents were being used in a sort of unethical and uncontrolled human experiment.

Dr. Sullivan, acting in her role of “restoring trust” between Flint residents and the State of Michigan, unleashed a volley of FACHEP propaganda. She electronically high-fived Dr. Zervos for speaking out” about the dangerous bacteria, inexplicably damned the State of Michigan for a “deluge of darkness that makes us afraid” and lauded McElmurry for navigating a “storm of voices that say that Flint residents aren’t able to handle the truth about their water.”

SIDEBAR CONVERSATIONS. Dr. Pauli wrote that at the beginning of the Flint library meeting, “I could tell we would have our work cut out for us winning <the activists> over. FACHEP worked overtime and pulled out all the stops after the formal presentation was over. In sidebar conversations Dr. Zervos (WSU) asserted the State of Michigan were “cheap bastards” who would not come up with necessary funding for bacteria testing. There were obviously hard feelings that FACHEP was not provided the full $13 million McElmurry initially requested.

Dr. Pauli also continued FACHEP’s smear campaign against Dr. Edwards. Herein, we only cite rumors that can be independently verified in Dr. Pauli’s draft book chapter or recorded public presentations. First, there was a FACHEP manufactured lie, that on December 8th Edwards requested Dr. McElmurry sign a “sweeping” written declaration that Flint water was “safe.” When in reality, Edwards had merely requested a quote from McElmurry acknowledging Flint water was “much improved” compared to the height of the crisis 13 months earlier. Then there was a Dr. Love-inspired litany of alleged financial conflicts including that Dr. Edwards was “paid,” “bought,” “sold out” or “collaborating” with the State of MI.

Pauli introduced another strategic misquote, that Edwards had “claimed that Flint’s tap water, when filtered, was of a higher quality than bottled water!” His book cites an article from which the actual written quote was “Edwards said, properly filtered water in the city was likely as good, if not better, than bottled water, especially prepackaged water that had been stored for a long time in hot conditions.” We note that Dr. Pauli has publicly stated his work “is focused on…less the truth of the crisis with a capital T, and more of the struggle around the crisis,”..and that “sometimes when you are engaged in a process of struggle, truth is your ally, and sometimes it isn’t.” There is a clear pattern of FACEHP sacrificing truth to support their “struggle” of creating a hero narrative for themselves.

Not content with just verbal rumors, Pauli put exclamation points on alleged differences between FACHEP’s message about water safety, and the many false claims they made about Edwards, by tweeting: “The team is not ready to make a blanket statement about the water being safe”. And in the book chapter Pauli wrote, “at least we were not proclaiming the water “safe” at the meeting.

DR. LOVE UNFILTERED

How on earth can someone portray the free distribution of POU filters, that are purchased voluntarily by tens of millions of American each year to remove particles, tastes/odors, lead and organic chemicals, as an unprecedented, life-threatening, uncaring human experiment? More importantly, WHY would someone do that? We trace it back to Dr. Love’s deep-seated insecurities and jealousies, and a quest to make her mark as a heroine of the Flint water crisis one way or another. 

The die was cast in her initial January 2016 email to Dr. Edwards, where she acknowledged the POU filters were her only professional experience remotely relevant to the FWC. Yet, even on that narrow topic, she had never published a single peer reviewed paper, or bothered to learn details of the Flint filter deployment. In terms of drinking water expertise, Dr. Love was a zero-trick pony, destined to repeatedly take the microphone on the FWC stage, solemnly making a case about alleged dangers of POU filters, yet earning only politely suppressed jeers from true experts observing the spectacle while rejecting her illogical reasoning.

At the December 14, 2016 press conference, with no true experts in her way, Dr. Love would get her chance to take the microphone unfiltered. We even suspect that the false written statement to Dr. Wells that nothing new would be presented, was deliberate, to make sure no voices of scientific reason would intrude or otherwise bear witness to what FACHEP was doing.

The 18 pages of written talking points prepared days in advance of the library meeting, starts with ignorance of communicating molecular microbiology results to the public (i.e., SLOAN MOBE 101), builds on negligent false assumptions about the POU filter deployment in Flint, and ended with Love’s POU Flint filter “manifesto” with a predetermined conclusion set in concrete months earlier. There was a heavy emphasis on using the words “anomalous,” “abnormal,” and “unusual” to describe DNA detected in the Flint filters, and a repeated implication that filtered Flint water was probably dangerous for consumption without additional treatment (see summary of some talking points below).

THE FLINT LIBRARY MESSAGE ACCORDING TO DR. BEN PAULI

We cite Dr. Ben Pauli’s personal account of the tone and tenor of FACHEP’s message from his draft book chapter:

…some unexpected results were emerging from the point-of-use filter study: bacteria were growing in the filters that did not seem to belong there. …. bacteria associated with the mammalian gut (suggestive of some sort of fecal contamination), including species listed by the World Health Organization as being especially dangerous because of their resistance to antibiotics…. <Given t>he unforeseen discovery of potentially pathogenic bacteria, it seemed like <residents> were entitled to know about the findings while there was still time to take extra precautions, even though the results were preliminary and analysis ongoing.

Bursting Dr. Pauli’s bubble of fictitious drama, twenty-seven months later, FACHEP has still not published compelling data to support their claims about dangers of POU filtered water. In mid-2017, FACHEP admitted they still had no evidence of harmful bacteria or filter associated disease. As for the “unforeseen discovery of potentially pathogenic bacteria” and antibiotic resistance DNA, that was foreseeable by anyone who bothered to read a few papers about application of molecular methods to drinking water samples anywhere in the world. None of this should have been construed as unique to Flint POU filters.

Yet the most ridiculous parts of Dr. Love’s “story,” were implied black magical properties of POU filters installed only in Flint. First, there was a claim that in Flint, somehow the POU filters were recreating a warm, nutrient-rich ecosystem of a “mammalian gut,” thereby growing human fecal pathogens that would cause “Shigella-like disease” with “especially dangerous” antibiotic resistance. Or as Dr. Pauli wrote ominously, that Filter use in Flint was not…comparable to filter use elsewhere” and the situation was “abnormal.”

Second, was the illusion that mounting a POU filter to the end of a kitchen faucet in Flint, negated all upstream treatments and created a “single barrier” to dangerous bacteria (see slide). Love’s Flint library slide literally implies, that the filter installation, caused Detroit’s water treatment plants serving Flint to magically vanish (see page 3 of this link for descriptions of multibarrier bacteria treatments in Detroit). This was irresponsible.

Dr. Love also made no mention Flint was benefiting from enhanced chlorine dosing, enhanced corrosion control, and intense bacterial monitoring required by EPA in Flint from early 2016 onwards as implemented by relief agencies. No mention that legally-required coliform bacterial monitoring proved that there was highly effective bacteria control, with results so good, that coliform bacteria were undetectable in Flint water samples for 3 consecutive years.

Given all of the above, why was Dr. Love so focused on POU filter dangers in Flint?  Imagine what would have happened, if Dr. Love had held a press conference, articulating her fears that filtered Ann Arbor drinking water was so dangerous, her family had actually started boiling it before consumption. Or held a press conference, announcing that all 4 million consumers of Detroit water with POU filters (probably at least a million people), should also boil or UV treat their water, and not just the 0.1 million consumers receiving the same Detroit water (but with enhanced disinfection) in Flint. Of course, such assertions would have exposed Dr. Love as an alarmist crackpot. It was only in Flint, where FACHEP had carefully prepared the ground with 4 months of rumormongering, that such unbalanced claims could be taken seriously.

The takeaway message received by Flint residents who attended the meeting were that: 1) their lives may be in imminent danger, 2) Flint water treatment was grossly inadequate, 3) POU filters were providing only a “single barrier” of protection, 4) the “wrong” filters were selected by relief agencies, and 5) the filter itself was somehow turning good old Detroit water into mammalian excrement. It was therefore little surprise when one panicked resident called the State and askedif they were going to die because they were drinking out of the filters.” This logically built on Love and McElmurry’s proven track record in scaring residents like the Webbers, or the resident who literally abandoned her Flint home after talking with McElmurry.

DR. LOVE: IT IS MY FAULT

After a drive home, Dr. Love realized there may have been problems with how the presentation was delivered. She blamed her tendency to be “laser focused,”confessing:

“I don’t feel like I answered questions well, and didn’t say some of the things that were important to say…In the future, I will benefit from having a practice run on the presentation.  I don’t get nervous, but I get laser focused on a few things at the expense of everything else. There are times when my laser focus is beneficial, but this was not one of them.  Truly, I’ve been known to forget my name because I was so laser focused. Spending 2.5 hours with a red knuckle grip on the steering wheel coming up just primed my “laser focus” pump.”

McElmurry reassured Dr. Love that she “did great…. <and> it went about as good as could be expected.” He then proudly forwarded the WNEM story reporting how FACHEP was successful in destroying resident trust and creating needless fear about bacteria on the filters. The meeting was a grand success from the perspective of FACHEP’s leader and according to Dr. Pauli’s book.

DR. LOVE:  IT IS NOT MY FAULT

After Dr. Love’s fantastic story of mammalian gut feces hit Dr. Wells’ fan at 5 am the next day, everything had to be dropped by Dr. Wells to change FACHEP’s dirtied diapers yet again. Whatever humility Dr. Love expressed the night before, was replaced by a renewed “laser focus” to “deny responsibility, accuse and blame others, and maintain a facade of arrogance and conceit.”

Love emailed McElmurry that “from my point of view:

1. No new information was presented. Indeed, I held off on new information….

2. I remain perplexed how the information about the increase in bacteria across the filters is a surprise. Not only have we discussed this with them before, especially during the “you are going to release shigella data” kerfuffle, but did they not read ANY literature about filters before they decided to deploy 24,000 of them in Flint? Literature, papers, NSF Standards? Anything? This should not be a surprise and was the public health community’s responsibility when they decided to deploy an intervention that they do not understand.

3. I think I was balanced and measured and clear. Counts go up (not unusual for these filters) and we are looking at who those bacteria are. Again, this is absolutely not new. The only thing that is new is that the general public, not just those who we sampled, are now aware of what the state should have told citizens was a risk from the beginning.

This email reveals Dr. Love in full Dunning-Kruger glory. Based on 0 years of experience in drinking water public health crises, she constructs an alternate reality in which she is blameless, and all the relief agencies are incompetent and unethical. How dare the agencies not acknowledge Dr. Love as a great moral exemplar, engineering ethics philosopher, waterborne disease expert, and gifted risk communicator.

McElmurry then pounced on an opportunity to further gaslight Dr. Wells with another misrepresentation of reality: “I want to stress that no new information was presented…Overall, I think those that attended received the message and took it well. Obviously, we can’t control what others do with the information.”

Well, did FACHEP control the image of the multibarrier water treatment plant, disappearing after attaching a POU filter to a kitchen faucet? Did FACHEP control the message sent about the “cheap bastards” at the State of MI sponsoring their research? What about Dr. Sullivan’s “deluge of darkness that makes us afraid,” or FACHEP implying that filter use in Flint was unlike anything heretofore experienced in America?  And if Dr. Wells did not like it, well, then what—still more pointless pleading to FACHEP’s higher motives?

WHAT ON EARTH IS WRONG WITH FACHEP LEADERSHIP?

Still struggling for an explanation regarding FACHEP’s reckless unscientific behavior, even after all the mistakes exposed in Parts 1-8, we found information online consistent with an emerging pattern of behavior that gave rise to the FACHEP-instigated Wells and Lyon felony cases:

When caught in the act with their unscrupulous behavior, most sociopaths and psychopaths will not show signs of contrition or remorse… On the contrary, they are more likely to double or triple down on their aggressive tendencies, increase hostility, deny responsibility, accuse and blame others, and maintain a facade of arrogance and conceit. Interestingly, many sociopaths will invent a victimhood story for themselves:…Casting themselves as victims can help sociopaths and psychopaths to defend their immoral conduct.

While we are not psychologists and cannot render a diagnosis, we nonetheless consider the above helpful, in providing a plausible hypothesis for behavior of this quintessential team of academic crybullies.

And to think that all of the above was accomplished from just 24 hours of Dr. Love unfiltered. After her first public taste of FACHEP glory, Love and McElmurry laid plans for an extraordinarily productive month. Over the holidays, when most of the world was taking a break, FACHEP would be working overtime to “double and triple down” on the Flint POU filter manifesto and inventing an epic story of victimhood.

Supporting Documents:

FACHEP December 14 Press Conference Handout

FOIA Packet

Primary Author: Dr. Marc Edwards

8 thoughts on “FACHEP vs. The People of the State of Michigan: Part IX One Day of Unfiltered Love

  1. One can only imagine how those citizens felt walking out of the Library after meeting with the “scientists” who had effectively issued an unofficial boil water advisory to them. What could possibly be more confusing than that combined with threats from new “pathogens” for them to share and tell their friends about.

    And, if one has any doubts about the apparent interest of the team in making others (eg. State officials) look bad, one need only read McElmurry’s seemingly deceptive e-mail to Wells indicating there would be no press there. As in, no big deal; she needn’t worry; just pro forma letting her know. You have to ask yourself…why would someone seem to go out of their way to make another person, who was likely trying hard to rectify the situation in Flint, look bad? Is it because one cannot be a super-hero unless they have demonized every other alternative to themselves??

    It’s a lot to process and take in. Perhaps the answer lies partly in the wording of the 2/6/16 WSU/FACHEP Press release likely written by the team themselves….

    ”In the midst of this maelstrom, a group of engineers along with medical, public health and social scientists assembled a research team to pursue answers to problems that others would rather leave unexamined. The authors of these papers from several universities and members of the research team — which included community members in meaningful roles — affirmed the higher purpose of science — to expand knowledge and serve the common good. As this FACHEP team developed, the key underpinning was the attention to clear, honest communication and careful listening to disenfranchised, marginalized Flint residents.”

    There is something fundamentally wrong about how that statement reads IMO. It smacks of condescending, ingratiating gestures by someone(s) with a superhero mentality. Also, filled with plenty of ‘us against them’. Why stoke more drama in an already stressed community?? It’s baffling.

    At any rate these “scientists” MUST care about the (disenfranchised & marginalized) Flint residents mustn’t they? The scientists were busily testing their water and finding more and more health risks and hazards for them to worry about.

    Who knows what a full $13M budget might have turned up!! Such concern and attention…what’s not to LOVE about that?

    If there was really a secondary public health crisis that’s one thing, if there was not, then these activities could be termed “scientific malpractice”. In which case, the activities of this group remind me more of war profiteers or carpet-baggers rather than “scientists”. It is good that you and the VT team have taken the time to expose this mess, in the hope that vulnerable communities may not be subjected to such activities in the future.

  2. There was a maelstrom, allright, but only the one that they invented.
    More and more, this seems to be an academic equivalent, of firefighter arson.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefighter_arson

    Reconsider FACHEP “hopes” of “impeding the rush to declare the crisis over.” What rush? The 14 months of painstaking engineering progress made before FACHEP lifted a finger? Why is it considered an existential threat, if data shows the water was “improving?”

    And we are wondering, who won over whom: FACHEP won over the activists per Dr. Pauli’s dubious historical account, or the activists won over FACHEP? From this point onwards, it will be shown FACHEP, was virtually indistinguishable from the activists.

    We do support activism. But not the post-truth activism of FACHEP. If they could not handle the truth with a capital “T,” could they at least uphold truth with a lower case “t,” without the outright and self-serving lies?

    And by far the worst is yet to come. One or two more blogs and we can get to it (not counting the trial which will be fascinating now that we know the characters). But you could not possibly believe what happened with FACHEP in Flint 2017-2018, without all of this background. Stay tuned.

    • Hi Marc: “Firefighter arson” is an extremely apt analogy, as is the Dunning-Kruger effect! And I do see 2 definitive acts of psychopathy on the part of Sedgewick. Specifically, deceiving Dr. Faust and misrepresenting her thesis work and products as his own, as well as his cruel toying with the devastated Flint homeowner about the real estate value of his home. Both acts show Sociopathic characteristics listed in the Psychology Today link, specifically, nakedly ambitious, shrewdly exploitative, and ruthlessly aggressive behavior often coupled with an initially charismatic approach with victims before revealing cruel intentions (or professional or profit driven ambitions).

      Whether such an individual (Sedgewick) is capable of imbuing a Group or Organization with these characteristics is a fascinating question. Especially when it’s a group of the Professoriate. However, I feel strongly that we must take Dr. Pauli at his word that he and FACHEP “won-over” the Flint activists; after all, as Dr. Pauli surely knows they (FACHEP) had the PhD’s as well as the need to publish with their ‘subjects’.

      Hence, it seems crystal clear who the victims were in Flint; in fact they had already been primed by the Pb in water crisis, and represented a fertile field for FACHEP to plow.

      I’m looking forward to more details on what led Sedgewick from the apparent heads up from former Wayne State lobbyist Harvey Hollins about the approaching gravy train, to Sedgewick’s aggressively grabbing the Golden Ticket (via Dr. Faust’s work as well as clothing himself in others work/slides), to FACHEP’s role in the post-crisis events in Flint, finally culminating in Sedgewick’s ‘deer in the headlights’ testimony against two State employees (FACHEP’s former state funding minders?).

      I’m really curious about that last step because it seems it would take a lot for a faculty member to possibly perjure themselves, unless, of course, they’re just stupid? How some of these people ended up on a star witness list still in these cases has me still scratching my head.

      Look forward to reading more! And, of course, you know that I am still hoping that Sedgewick is wrong about the World: https://www.wingclips.com/movie-clips/the-emperors-club/who-we-really-are

    • Hmm, a forensic accountant would probably say, follow the money. I suppose a contracting special prosecutor isn’t paid unless he tries cases. And one probably cannot try cases without star witnesses.

      I’m open minded also, and relieved not to be involved; sorting through possible layers of motives could be complicated.

  3. Cheers, I appreciate it.
    http://cialispego.com/
    duração do efeito do cialis diario cialis without a doctor prescription enalapril e cialis [url=http://cialismsnrx.com/]cialis generic[/url]
    fake cialis canada
    cialis le prix en pharmacie
    cialis 10mg online australia
    cialis 20mg achat france
    cialis france prix pharmacie
    cialis tadafil 20 mg opinioni

  4. You have made your stand very effectively!!
    http://cialismsnrx.com/
    cialis tempi di azione cialis 20 mg cialis sau entran forte [url=http://cialisttk.com/]cialis without a doctor prescription[/url]
    cialis time between doses
    cialis dagligen
    cialis iasi
    cialis home page
    le cialis est il en vente libre en suisse
    cialis with blood pressure meds

  5. Many thanks. An abundance of information.

    http://cialisttk.com/
    cialis dopo intervento prostata cialis online cialis buy in india [url=http://cialismsnntx.com/]cialis 20 mg[/url]
    cialis generic forum
    buy cialis in america
    how many hours does it take for cialis to work
    crushing cialis pills
    atarax 100 mg arret commercialisation
    onde comprar cialis em campinas

  6. Effectively voiced certainly. .
    http://cialisttk.com/
    acheter cialis sans ordonnance cialis without a doctor prescription how long does it take for one a day cialis to work [url=http://cialisttk.com/]cialis 20 mg[/url]
    popper e cialis
    side effects of once a day cialis
    drinking beer cialis
    cialis and bypass surgery
    cialis con ricetta bianca
    donde comprar cialis argentina

  7. You suggested that effectively.
    http://cialispego.com/
    ar kenkia cialis cialis without a doctor prescription cialis and blood pressure medication [url=http://cialismsnrx.com/]cheap cialis[/url]
    pramil cialis ou viagra
    venta de cialis por internet en chile
    handla cialis
    cialis generico dall’italia
    vendo cialis original chile
    cialis 5mg moins cher

  8. Thank you, Ample tips!

    http://cialismsnrx.com/
    cialis side effects numbness cialis generic puedo comprar cialis sin receta en farmacia [url=http://cialismsnntx.com/]buy cialis online[/url]
    cialis gives me heartburn
    cialis kiffen
    comprar cialis generico contrareembolso espaГ±a
    cialis viagra levitra karЕџД±laЕџtД±rma
    10mg cialis per day
    cheapest generic cialis 20mg

  9. Valuable data. Thanks a lot.
    http://cialisttk.com/
    precio del cialis en farmacias del ahorro en mexico buy cialis online cialis tablete u beogradu [url=http://cialisttk.com/]cialis generic[/url]
    cialis cause depression
    sind cialis schädlich
    que es el viagra cialis
    cialis promoção
    printable coupon for cialis
    cialis and dapoxetine

  10. Regards! I appreciate this!
    http://cialismsnntx.com/
    pronounce word cialis cialis generic cialis tadalafil effetti collaterali [url=http://cialismsnntx.com/]cheap cialis[/url]
    cialis pret ieftin
    bula de cialis diario
    cialis online cheap from canada
    preis cialis Г¶sterreich
    cialis best time to take
    what works better viagra levitra or cialis

  11. This is nicely put! .
    http://cialismsnntx.com/
    cialis kaufen in hamburg cialis online se puede tomar cialis con enalapril [url=http://cialismsnrx.com/]generic cialis[/url]
    para que serve esse remedio cialis
    potenzmittel cialis wirkung
    generic cialis from china
    getting cialis in australia
    cialis generico in erboristeria
    cialis copay discount

  12. Helpful information. Appreciate it!
    http://cialismsnrx.com/
    mexico pharmacy cialis buy cialis online how long is cialis good for after expiration date [url=http://cialisttk.com/]generic cialis[/url]
    cialis 5 mg prix au maroc
    cialis cause ed
    how long before cialis takes effect
    il cialis si prende a stomaco vuoto
    cialis original erfahrungen
    cialis deneyimleri

  13. Thanks a lot. Terrific information.
    http://cialismsnntx.com/
    cialis tadalafil 20mg original cialis generic kamagra-cialis.biz sicuro [url=http://cialisttk.com/]cialis 20mg[/url]
    what does cialis cost per pill
    cialis 10mg online australia
    cialis soffio al cuore
    cialis erste einnahme
    experiencias con cialis generico
    cialis precio en mexico df

  14. This is nicely expressed. !
    http://cialispego.com/
    donde compro las pastillas cialis cialis without a doctor prescription cialis vs psa [url=http://cialismsnntx.com/]buy cialis online[/url]
    cialis con dapoxetina
    buy cialis in melbourne
    daily use cialis price
    vergoed menzis cialis
    le cialis generique est il efficace
    what is 36 hour cialis

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *